Since the theory of translation as a science, then why,
Strictly speaking, it is not enriched by new concepts from the field of allied sciences such as sociology, sociolinguistics, psychology and ethnography?
In recent years linguists have become increasingly make such facilities in the field of translation That approach the idea of a broader interpretation of the translation process. You can, for example, refer to "the concept of functional similarity, according to which the information function of the study of linguistic elements of the original set and what the language means able to perform the same function in translation. Thus, further development of modern linguistic theory of translation, seems to be on the path of further development of existing linguistic concepts.
In order to develop a professional translation is very important to study, in our opinion, all these aspects. Mass transfer practice further emphasizes the need for its in-depth theoretical study.
But if the free and literal translations methods cannot serve as a guide to the activities of the translator, then does it follow that by doing so the interpreter at all deprived of the rights of individual creativity? And if not, then what rights he has the creative? The extent to which it is independent from the author? Or, in other words The extent to which it can "deploy" their talents, to reflect their understanding of the translation of the original? To answer these questions, consider the following points.

Along with the linguistic study of translation method, there is nonlinguistic School of Translation, one of which is literary criticism, which studies the problems of literary translation. Literary approach to translation has been widely developed in the XIX century. What position is the most characteristic literary analysis of the translation? First of all, apparently, we should note a number of researchers striving to isolate literary translation.